Rob.c.weiss's Journal, 26 December 2013

Hi, everyone! This is the post I wanted to do yesterday, but went to bed instead. Hah!

<h2>Decemburrrrrr!</h2>
Wow, what a whirlwind this month has been! I'm glad the busiest part is over. Had an absolutely GREAT time, but there's been a lot of running and doing. Keeping on track has not been easy, and I've missed a lot of workouts, but I'm still doing pretty well.

<h2>Vacation!</h2>
Maddie (my 13-year-old daughter) and I went on a little vacation to a waterpark about 3 hours from here. It was one of her Christmas presents. We had a **BLAST**! And because I'm down over a hundred pounds and way more fit since the last time we went, I went on a bunch of the water slides. They have a million stairs... and I was kind of counting on them to give me my workouts while we were away. It felt GREAT to actually be *in the game* after so long floating in the "lazy river", what I'd always done before. In fact, the one day I was ready to do more, and my poor daughter was too tired -- she was done. I know it probably sounds crazy, but that felt better than anything. For so many years, I was the dad that was too tired to keep up with her, and finally I'd done everything she wanted, and I still had juice left. :D It is a kind of validation that I didn't even realize I had been missing. Well, truly I knew I was missing it... but I guess I wasn't entirely sure I'd ever be able to keep up with the kid. Speaking of whirlwinds, she is the original.

Anyway, I did not track my foods, I ate what I wanted mostly. I stopped myself quite a bit, but I allowed a lot too (all the time hoping all those stairs would help me out). The package I bought is all-inclusive, even booze. I'm not much of a drinker, but I did have 4 or 5 poolside foo-foo drinks on the trip. All meals were buffet -- my big downfall, but I did ok.

<h2>Stats</h2>
I ended up losing about 2.6 pounds on the trip through yesterday's weigh-in. I came in about a pound short of my weekly target / goal, but I can hardly complain -- I still lost over 3 pounds last week. And the best part? While we were away, I made that short-term goal of 225 lbs!!! I'm officially down 116 lbs and have lost over one third of my starting weight. And over half of my current weight! For those that enjoy the gross-out factor, I've lost about 16 gallons of fat. (Ugh! Scary!) I'm officially down 9 pants sizes, I can squeeze into size 38 pants (really tight! Still using 40's every day). A few more pounds and they'll be comfortable. I haven't worn size 38 pants since I was a teenager. That was a lifetime ago. I can't wait.

Missing all those workouts did cost me almost a pound (0.9 lbs) of muscle. I'll have to work to get that back. But that couldn't be helped, and my numbers still look good compared to where I started. I don't have numbers from when I started back in July, as the poor scale couldn't handle my weight then. So the best I have are numbers from about a year before in 2012 (below) with this morning's numbers. Keep in mind the 2012 numbers are still about 18 pounds lower than the number I actually started at in July of this year (340 lbs!). Also, keep in mind that this scale runs about 3 pounds lighter (it has me at 221.4, as opposed to my official weight today of 224.2). The columns in green are not from the scale. Those are my own calculations based on the info the scale is giving. I'm just using simple math there, but I'm not sure if that's the correct way to calculate it, so the numbers in green may not be right:



(Note to @Draglist and @Kingkeld: my numbers are so dramatically different than yours, I'm thinking I'm not totally calculating it correctly; Still considering getting that Tanita, but for now this is giving me enough info to get by. But Bill, for instance using your numbers from 12/24, I'm getting that you are 76% muscle {167.2 / 219.8 = 76%}. That strikes me as crazy-high. I can't imagine *anyone* is 76% muscle. What about blood, skin tissue, bone, brain mass, connective tissue? It just seems really high. Anyway, I can't figure that out.)

You can see, based on the numbers, I'm down 105 lbs of fat. And if you figure most of the other 18 lbs I lost was fat, I'm probably down closer to 120 - 123 lbs of fat. I'm up 3.7 lbs of muscle mass, and a massive gain of water weight, almost 22 lbs! My hydration is much better these days. BMI is down to 32.7 (was over 50 at my start). That's still considered "obese", but I'm at the low-end, shooting to get to "overweight" (203 lbs; BMI 30) by the beginning of February.

<h2>Goal Weight</h2>
I've struggled with trying to identify a final goal to get to. I haven't been under 200 lbs since I was a teen. The height / weight charts say I should be between 130 and 160 lbs. I say they are nuts. The best I'd been able to determine was that I probably should be somewhere between 160 and 180, and I thought I would *figure it out* when I got to 180. I'm still thinking that. But I thought I'd take a different tack on determining the right number. I have another chart (from BuiltLean; hopefully they let me direct-link it below) that shows for a man my age (43), "ideal" is somewhere between 16 and 21% body fat:



If that's true, I need to lose about another 21% body fat to get to the lowest "ideal" for me of 16%, which (if I'm calculating it correctly) should be around 47 more pounds. That would put me at 177 lbs., which seems to affirm my primary goal of 180. I'll stick with 180 for now. Next short-term goals: 215 (down 125 lbs) and 200 lbs.

<h2>Max Cal Deficit</h2>
I recently added that column "Max Cal Deficit" to my fat-tracking spreadsheet based on information I got from Bill (Draglist) and KingKeld. That could not have come at a better time for me. Thanks guys!!! They posted that calculation (Fat pounds * 30), saying that having a calorie deficit greater than this number is counter-productive. Your body will steal from muscle rather than utilize fat stores. (Correct me if I have over-simplified it, guys). The funny part was that they posted that info the same day I had read an article on the exact same topic! But the article did not provide any specific way to determine when it becomes a problem. As I was puzzling over the article and questioning the last goals I had posted (Bill, you'll remember that's the one that had me at 180 by March 19th), here comes the salvation from Bill and Keld! -- A tool that I'll be able to use to avoid this problem.

By the way, if you want to read the article I was reading, it is here (http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/153704-myth-or-fact-simple-math-3500-calories-one-pound-eat).

<h2>Aggressive Weight Loss</h2>
I have been fairly aggressive in my weight loss. I don't recommend this for most of you, but I have my reasons. A few people on here know my reasons. The good news for me is that things couldn't be better. Doc is well aware of everything, and it is all under his supervision. Blood tests are all FANTASTIC! I have had no adverse affects, no loss of energy, no exhaustion, and even my loose skin is shrinking remarkably. I'm a bit shocked by that last part. I really thought it would be much looser than it is. I can tell that it has rebounded very well. I'm just hoping it keeps up. But I know I've been skating a bit of a line, without quite knowing where that line was (or even the reason for the line in the first place). Reading that article, and the subsequent post by Draglist (info by Keld), really helped to shed light on things for me. And it actually provided the tool to find where that line is for me.

I can easily see why that line has not yet come into play for me (with a maximum calorie deficit in the three, four and five thousands), but why it soon will (it is dipping down into the two thousands now). I now know those last goals I posted (my journal from Dec 7th) are impossible. At least some of them are. The problem is that the formula, being based on fat pounds (and not just body weight), would be difficult to incorporate into future projections. Unless I can determine a better method, my plan right now is to stick with the goals I've made, but know in my own mind that they are going to have to be a bit *fluid*, getting pushed out as needed. I'll have to keep a close eye on that "Max Cal Deficit" number, and how I'm doing in relation to it. That's a line I do not want to cross.

I work best when I know the plan myself, and have it clear in my head. I always have. So I plan to still try and determine a method for coming up with some realistic goals and dates by which to make them. If I come up with those, I'll post them.

For now, this is the best I can do... These are the goals I posted on Dec 7th:



I'm adjusting them as follows:

Goal 4: just made it :D
Goal 4b: by somewhere between 1/8/2014 and 1/10/2014
Goal 5: by somewhere between 2/5/2014 and 2/12/2014
Goal 5b: by somewhere between 2/26/2014 and 3/22/2014
Goal 6: by somewhere between 3/19/2014 and 5/21/2014


<h2>Today</h2>
As for today's weigh-in, I ended up gaining back 0.2 lbs from the Christmas day celebrations yesterday. Not too bad, all things considered. And I'm going to resume workouts today!!! Woo hoo! I'm actually looking forward to it big-time.

A special thanks to all you guys and gals that actually read this whole thing. You're my online buddies and pals, and I cannot tell you how much your support means. Thank you! I'm sorry I've been scarce, but I'm going to go read up on what I've missed!

As Keld says, life is good. :D Keep smiling, and let's lose this weight!!!
224.2 lb Lost so far: 115.8 lb.    Still to go: 44.2 lb.    Diet followed reasonably well.

Diet Calendar Entries for 26 December 2013:
799 kcal Fat: 19.87g | Prot: 82.57g | Carb: 69.12g.   Breakfast: Coffee, Syntrax Nectar Vanilla Bean Torte Whey Protein Isolate, Aldi BEAUMONT FRENCH VANILLA CAPPUCCINO, Vitafusion MultiVites Gummy Vitamins, Silk Pure Unsweetened Vanilla Almond Milk. Lunch: Syntrax Nectar Strawberry Mousse Whey Protein Isolate, Aldi BEAUMONT FRENCH VANILLA CAPPUCCINO, Silk Pure Almond Milk - Unsweetened Vanilla, Light & Fit Greek - Cherry. Dinner: Clementines, Overstuffed Beef Ravioli. Snacks/Other: Cream Cheese Spread, Triscuit Crackers Original. more...
3225 kcal Activities & Exercise: Weight Training (moderate) - 1 hour, Walking (brisk) - 4/mph - 30 minutes, Resting - 14 hours and 30 minutes, Sleeping - 8 hours. more...
gaining 1.4 lb a week

6 Supporters    Support   

Comments 
Rob YOU are *so* becoming who you want to be,who you no doubt are inside,on the outside for all to see.What an awesome accomplishment!!! And *thank* you for sharing all of the *unexpected* moments...they are,if not more,exciting & encouraging than the physical changes you speak about :D As for all the "geek stuff" I love it....don't understand it all but am trying b/c, as you,I find it easier to apply to myself & my circumstances when I "get it".Like others I will be reading that link too :D Im interested in learning the difference between body fat% that you mentioned & BMI. My scale displays my BMI which is the reason I bought it however I thought BMI was the & of fat on the body. Also wanna find out more as to calorie deficits since Im planning on using that in some months ahead. The charts are *huge* motivators for me,just wish I knew how to create them on a computer to share here. Anyway,enough about *me* on *your* post (LOL) just know, the way you feel about Keld,someone ;) feels that way about you!  
27 Dec 13 by member: myawethinTICself
@Keld, LOL. True about the bones. I'll be true believer if I get to 170 and still need to lose some fat. But that's why I think the fat / muscle monitor is the best weight loss tool around. TBH, I think everyone should dump their scales entirely and work entirely from the fat / muscle monitor alone. 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
@Bill, hey no worries. I know how that is, especially this time of year. I'm still trying to figure out what that "muscle mass" on the Tanita means. Everywhere I look on the internet, everything pretty much agrees that men have between 40 and 50%. I literally found like 10 different things that said that (a few said between 35 and 45%), and that the "average" man has 42%, while the "average" woman has 36%. Then I found a bunch of bodybuilders saying there is no possible way to get more than 50% without steroids. Anyway, I'll get off that now... just confused about what number it is actually giving you guys. Either way, I think the point of the monitor is to help see what's *changing* in our own bodies, rather than comparing mine to yours. So, I guess it really doesn't much matter. But it sure seems like the numbers I get aren't exactly comparable to the numbers you're getting. LOL. Technology. Go figure. 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
Hi, @lauraab!!! Thanks for the warm comments. :D 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
Thank you, @myawethinTICself! It does feel great! And strangely, it is still so much the same. Hard to explain, I guess. But you're right, the *geeky* stuff might help you. Then again, it may not. Personally, it helps me a lot. It puts me in control of my ship a lot more... For a part of my life that felt so out-of-control for so long, to finally have it mastered, it means a lot to me. It adds so much more to my confidence, knowing that I actually do have a say in where my body goes and what it does, and how it does it. I think it depends on the person. But, I do think having a fat / muscle monitor makes a HUGE difference. Let's face it, you want to lose fat not muscle. In fact, gaining at least *some* muscle should be in everyone's goal here. Increasing muscle increases your metabolism (muscle tissue needs to burn energy -- and a lot of it; having more burns more calories). So overall you want to decrease your body fat % and increase your muscle %. Just so you know, BMI does not tell you your body fat % ... it is really just a way to turn your height and weight into a single number that can go onto a chart to give a rough indication if you are overweight. BMI is a good number to look at to give you a quick indicator, but it isn't much more than that. A fat monitor, on the other hand, can tell you if you've lost fat, even on days when the scale goes UP! So when you've been really really good, and the scale goes up, a fat monitor can tell you: don't panic, you *did* lose fat, you just gained some water. You don't need any fancy programs for one (you can even track it with paper and pencil), and you can pick up a decent one for as little as $40. Look into it! :D Thank you again for your support, TIC! And keep going strong. You'll do this! :D 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
Hey @TIC, one more quick thing I should add on BMI: Being a number that just correlates height to weight, it tends to be pretty useless for one individual, as your height doesn't change. As your weight goes up, your BMI goes up, and vice versa. It was intended more for healthcare professionals dealing with many patients all of different heights to get them all onto one chart. That way, when a doctor hears the number 22, she knows it's a good number, while 30 is getting bad. For us personally, worried about our own progress, we may as well just ignore BMI and look at weight. Or better yet, that fat percentage I was talking about. 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
I suppose I am going to have to get a Tanita scale just to understand what you geeky guys are rambling on about. LMAO!!! What kind does everyone have? I looked on Amazon and there is a wide range of Tanitas. 
28 Dec 13 by member: Mom2Boxers
Mine is actually a cheap-o one (not a Tanita) I picked up for about $25 a few years ago from Aldi. They usually offer them in January (weight loss season). Hah! Bill's is a "Tanita BC533 Glass Innerscan Body Composition Monitor" $89 on Amazon. KingKeld's is a "Tanita BC-601 Segmental Body Composition Monitor", about $325 on Amazon. I don't doubt the Tanita is better and more accurate, but I find mine (so far) to be good enough to show me how I'm doing. I may get a better one later, but for now it does a pretty good job. 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
Oh my! Kingkeld's style will not be my choice. There are too many kitchen gadgets I would rather have. Ha Ha! I will look into the one Bill has, I think. Thanks for all that info. I did wonder what everyone was using. :) 
28 Dec 13 by member: Mom2Boxers
No worries, @Mom! Glad to help. If I was getting one today, I think I'd pick up the one Bill has too. 
28 Dec 13 by member: Rob.c.weiss
<<Prev 

     
 

Submit a Comment


You must  sign in to submit a comment
 

Other Related Links

Members



Rob.c.weiss's weight history


Get the app
    
© 2024 FatSecret. All rights reserved.